Rojalist u 20:17, 15 juni 2023

2023-06-15T20:17:00Z

Nova stranica

{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:34px;">Wikipedia</span>}}
<div class="plainlinks" style="text-align: justify;">
[[Datoteka:Wikipedia-inverse.png|okvir|desno|<div style="text-align: justify;">Wikipedia project, by '''Wikimedia Foundation''', the most important project of UK intelligence and Jesuits in the US since 9/11/2001, aimed at the '''hijacking of the Internet from the Americans (American Protestants)'''. The project and those who try to steward it seek to wrap the globe inside a fake version of reality in baron Rothschild's (Britain's and Vatican's) interest. After realizing some centuries ago that individually they are too small for the task, the UK and the Vatican (or their banks' owner [https://translate.google.ba/translate?hl=en&sl=bs&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.royalfamily.ba%2Fwiki%2FKripto-Jevreji_Balkana Rothschild], rather) joined forces and integrated their own mad views of imperialism as a method of '''conquest and plunder''' (instead of '''enlightenment''' as [[Stecak|originally set out by the '''Illyrian proto-empire''']]).</div>]]
Project ''Wikipedia'' (www.wikipedia.org) is a '''fake encyclopedia''' created by the '''Vatican''', '''Great Britain''' and her loyalists and quislings for '''re-taking of the Internet from the Americans ([[Donald_Trump#How_Washington_was_won|American Protestants]])''', and for controlling of online exchange of information in a '''hybrid warfare''' as pertinent to national interests of Great Britain as the so-called leader of the free world. As the appearance of benevolent volunteers is crucial for the success of such a warfare encyclopedia project, entire "armies" of young Freemasons and papists are used to that end. Hence the name of ''wikipedia'' chosen from the occult word ''Wicca'' meaning '''Pagan witchcraft'''. Wicca is presented by Wikipedia as a "new religious movement". Wikipedia was christened thus as a way of attracting the aforesaid crowds towards working on the project in Britain's geopolitical interest. As a side-note, '''Freemasonry are the British elite quislings''', while '''papists are papal loyalists mostly but not necessarily Roman-Catholics'''.

==Historical background: Wikipedia as a Germanic Encyclopedia, Trump as Wilson==

See [[Donald Trump|Main Article]].

==Youth brigades and other Storm troops==
[[Datoteka:TypicalWikipedians.jpg|okvir|desno|<div style="text-align: justify;">Typical "Wikipedians" (as they like calling themselves). Constantly-ecstatic facial expressions are characteristic of the group, revealing a '''cultist devotion''' to the mission - regardless what the current proclaimed version of that mission is - ranging from fake climate change to fake environmentalism, and beyond. As long as a ''Truth du jour'' is "officially official" - they will promote it (unoficcially, of course).]].</div>
Teenage and teenage-evoked youth are most represented among Wikipedia users who edit the contents and who are commonly referred to as '''editors''' - a term that gives the whole structure a much desired professional feel. Editors so-called come mostly from Freemasonry family background (including the rare daughter of a Freemason) which is why they are mostly male, followed by (mostly middle-aged) part-time paid editors of military background but poor educational background, as well as a smaller crowd of full-time editors that include a few PhD's according to themselves. '''Teenage editors''' are generally recognized by independent observers as the most aggressive and rude users of Wikipedia in general. Most editors are anonymous.

Since the Freemasonry as a British Trojan Horse is largely ridiculed in the United States, additional US editors are recruited from a '''liberal background''' including "free-thinking" universities, mostly from California. Thus the majority of editors who appear to be volunteering are in fact not volunteers; many are professionals and include '''military servicemen''' of the like mindset and '''retired military''' servicemen and '''intelligence analysts''' as well. Those three demographic groups (teen mobs; frustrated liberals; retired militarists) make up most of the Wikipedia editors. Editors with college degrees who do not belong in the above main groups tend to leave quickly, repelled by the general sectarian and kindergarten-like mentality accompanied by aggressiveness (often wrapped up in '''fake politeness''' or '''gentlemanship''' followed regularly by convoluted citations of the-rule-and-regulation that make no sense whatsoever, and are very often contradicting each other as well).

==Beginnings==
Wikipedia was originally created by the British intelligence and Jesuit-Vatican loyalists in the US (found mainly among the Democratic Party following), as a geostrategic tool for '''effectively hijacking Internet from the Americans'''. Wikipedia's role primarily is to channel the current version of '''Official Reality''' to British loyalists around the world. This has significantly cut down necessary communication along the '''infiltrator-handler-headquarters''' vector and has made the British global intelligence effort more efficient and robust than ever before. For old-school infiltrators and agents in foreign lands who do not possess a working knowledge of English language, Wikipedias in foreign tongues were created and staffed from local (as a rule of thumb - younger) Masonic and papist communities mostly.

Along with the mass production of '''fake news''' (classically termed '''sophistry''' before World War 2), Wikipedia is Britain's most important tool in the information world war that began with electronic media breaking international borders. Wikipedia has become crucial after 2005 when the leading journal for promoting [https://fakescience.royalfamily.ba '''fake science'''], called ''Nature Magazine'', created a fable according to which Wikipedia ought to be recognized for being as reliable as '''Encyclopedia Britannica''' itself.

==Under the hood==
[[Datoteka:German-DirectornFinder.jpg|thumb|225px|desno|<div style="text-align: justify;">'''Nachfeldpeiler P57N''' German direction-finding radio, mounted inside a van, used in WW2 for locating clandestine transmitters and receivers. This unit was used by the Germans after the occupation to locate resistance groups. The van could slowly traverse the streets to detect the transmitters and receivers used by resistance groups, and pinpoint the location to a very small area. (From: [https://museumofworldwarii.org/collection/resistance/ Museum of WW2]). '''Wikipedia uses identical methodology''' for detecting-locating-isolating of its enemies, in form of digital-age technology including military-grade equipment.]]</div>
In order to maintain the public appearance of "''encyclopedia anyone can edit''", anonymous users are permitted as well, although they are not really anonymous as their IP address is logged and publicly displayed next to the edit performed. Proxy servers, normally used for bypassing network-wide blocks, are strictly forbidden, and considered by the crowd as targets for "free hunt" at will. As a rule of thumb, "IP users" are presumed suspicious ("guilty") until proven obedient ("innocent") to the will of the crowd. The obsession with hunting down "the enemy" is so strong that "Wikipedians" (term used with pride by the "elite" to separate themselves from the "rest of us") use military-grade devices and software to literally locate allegedly anonymous user's real physical address, much like '''Nazi elite''' forces (often including the '''Hitler Jugend/youth''' members as part of military practice) used radio-locators with [https://museumofworldwarii.org/collection/resistance/ '''Nachfeldpeiler P57N German direction-finding radio mounted inside a van''']. The goal was to hunt down resistance members while they were using radios for communication. In the case of Wikipedia, once "hunted down", a user can then easily become a target of real intelligence operatives. As a minimum measure, such a user is "marked" and virtually forever banned from Wikipedia '''no matter what'''.

At times, significant parts of the "Wikipedians" community exhibit so much mass hysteria and paranoia, that the whole community can readily be equated with a sect - individuals grouped without necessarily being aware of the reason for getting together in the first place, but completely devoted to "the cause" long lost under the weight of idiosyncratic dogma (rules and regulation in case of Wikipedia). Nevertheless, at the same time, they are extremely resolved to "locate, isolate, and eliminate the enemy" - who is usually understood as the source of all their troubles, even personal health issues like insomnia or poor digestion according to their often complaining. Such nonsensical attitude then gets a swift support from the rest of the community, much like members of an animal den exhibit support for each other on the purely instinct level. Interestingly enough, in most, if not all (brief) TV appearances over the years, community members have revealed purely introvert psychological profiles; their ability to clearly convey a message to the public bordered with latent cretinism in some cases.

Wikipedia is enveloped in a bullet-proofed wall of what is quite literally a '''jungle of rules and regulations''' that no one can say understands completely or even largely. Any privileged editor can interpret those rules and regulations in any way they wish, in order to justify his/her actions. Privileged editors aka '''Admins''' (short for ''Administrators'') and '''Sysops''' (short for ''System Operators'') have the ability to block or ban anyone as they see fit, without justification - in an absolutist manner reflective of British imperial mentality while the overbureaucratization reveals the Germanic ''k und k'' (imperial) mentality as well. That '''hard-line imperial mentality permeates throughout Wikipedia''' and is particularly excitingly adopted by younger Freemason crowd who are quickest to exhibit the '''gang-up''' or '''lynch mentality''' - commonly recognized in psychological studies of mass behavior on similar statistical and demographic samples. As mentioned earlier, '''teenage admins''' (whose very existence as an authority group unmasks the whole project rather instantly) are unmatched in aggressiveness and rudeness. They also have the authority to ban any user whom they dislike. And as with any teenager - that often does happen quite literally; when they simply dislike an editor, they ban both the hated editor and delete his/her contribution(s), even from the discussion sections so there is no trace of even an attempt to support a proposed contribution with facts. The instinct-driven crowd goes so far as to even trace all changes a banned individual had made over many years, and viciously delete them all, resembling Stalin's way of handling his enemies by redacting old photographs by erasing the banished individual from history.

==Independence appearance==
One of the most notorious side-effects of Wikipedia's way of massaging truth is the unavoidable locking down of entire articles and groups of articles for a prescribed period of time, according to the level of perceived danger that an undesired editor and his/her proposed edit pose. The '''appeals procedure''' does exist (also extremely complicated so that it, in fact, discourages appeals); however, it too exists only for the effect and appearance of a fair and publicly open encyclopedia: '''appeals virtually never result in reversal decisions'''.

Like all social networks (Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube being best-known examples), Wikipedia too suffers from the problem of ''fake accounts'' including robots (both the bots for performing automated maintenance actions, and bots for impersonating live editors): most of the above-described interests are served and protected by apparent armies of editors, whereas each individual physical editor has, in fact, 10s and in some cases even 1000s of fake accounts, most of which are never disclosed but can be traced with a minor effort by observing Wikipedia's edit logs. However, as mentioned above, logs in some cases are also subject to change and/or deletion without a trace in case of strategically important edits that do not comply with the official current truth.

The increase in the number of fake accounts is directly proportionate to the drastic drop in real people editing Wikipedia, particularly after 2010. (Wikimedia admits the drop has happened but denies its extent, which is around 75% of those who left Wikipedia, likely for good.) That points to the above-revealed information that the whole project is a Britain's geostrategic tool for hybrid warfare, and nothing else.

==Complete global coverage==
To "tell their story", other governments try to influence Wikipedia so from time to time foreign intelligence services like MOSSAD get caught doing mass edits in accordance with their defined national interests in global hybrid warfare as well. The reason why Wikipedia is attractive to governments in addition to the UK's lies in this fake encyclopedia's absolute top (page 1) placements within search listings by the NSA-created company Google Inc. for practically every generic word or term.

With Wikipedia losing its following at a steady pace, and due to significant blows to its reputation including Google recently dropping Wikipedia from search results in many concentrated generic keyword searches, the British intelligence is trying to keep up their project alive. To that end, updates of the already complex '''Mediawiki software''' (the platform specially tailored for the project) are offered regularly, although that too, in fact, contributes to Wikipedia's speedy demise.

As an example of attempted global domination in the information arena, in order to reinstate England's former puppet dynasty in the Balkans, the English language Wikipedia created an entire network of heavy-weight lies on the Balkans past and present. This network of lies includes articles about Balkans artificial nations - the article on '''Bosnia and Herzegovina''' is a characteristic example, being top-to-bottom a composite of blatant lies which can't be edited. Other lies come in form of articles too, but then also fake categories and templates aimed at tightening the grip on the information theater in an ongoing regional hybrid war. This network of lies on Balkans (and by extension on any other strategic topic) relies on methodology like:
* '''preferential sources''' - where only scientific (and even non-scientific) references that tell one side of a story are allowed, while all others are strictly censored and those who try adding them are banned or blocked,
* '''fake consensus''' - where a democratic principle of ''majority vote'' is misapplied so that preferred scientific truth is voted on as though science itself were subject to democratic rules,
* '''hoax-labeling''' - where undesired contributions are labeled as hoaxes and their proponents ridiculed, gang-ambushed by groups of editors (often one or two editors advocating same interest using countless accounts),
etc.

</div>

[[Kategorija:Bosna]]
[[Kategorija:Društvo]]
[[Kategorija:Istorija]]
[[Kategorija:Nauka]]
[[Kategorija:Svijet]]
[[Kategorija:Umjetnost]]

Wikipedia - Istorija izmjena

Rojalist u 20:17, 15 juni 2023